🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."