🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple clients who are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.